is pretty robust on Linux, way more so than you might think, and it has been for several years. In addition to that, the infrastructure and community for plugins, standards, etc. They obviously think it’s worth the effort. There is no shortage of creative DAWs and apps and plugins nowadays on Linux. Heck, even Tracktion/Waveform runs on Linux. I mean, even Bitwig has been running on Linux for what… 5+ years? Obviously it’s not a post production DAW like Nuendo, but it’s really impressive on Linux. Several DAWs already run on Linux, plus a large number of open source audio apps have been evolving for many, many years, some of which are really impressive. Many musicians/producers already using Linux would also strongly disagree with you. While I agree that people shouldn’t hold their breath for Steinberg to jump in, I think it’s a stretch to say it’s not a money maker or not worth the effort – clearly some developers would disagree with you. And all application developers are ultimately in business to make money. Somebody would probably make a shell but it’s still an extra step and potential weak link in the chain.Įven if it’s a great for my functionality and computer efficiency standpoint it is not a money maker once you factor in resources required to make it happen.
#Harrison mixbus linux download drivers#
Video, audio drivers and support, porting over not just some but pretty much all of the desirable plugins in the world. Making the app run on Linux is just the tip of the iceberg.
0 kommentar(er)
